InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 18
Posts 1515
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2023

Re: Blue Skys post# 68636

Sunday, 04/07/2024 12:59:47 PM

Sunday, April 07, 2024 12:59:47 PM

Post# of 69839
I don't want to burst your bubble but the tone of GS's tweet is quite negative. Just consider yourself as one of the new ten newbie judges. A pile of cases are presented to you. You don't start with the oldest but rather the most recent case and work backwards. Why? Judges know that if a case has been sitting around too long, something is amiss. Usually that means that a predecessor deliberately avoided ruling on the case for one reason or another.

The case with Callesse clearly is one that the previous judges felt should be settled out of court. I believe that a decision by the judges would have set a dangerous precedent that they preferred not to author. ...and even if they do choose to rule on the case, it will probably be to pass it back down to the lower courts for a retrial or further investigation on a minute technicality.

A 100% resolution sufficient for GS to take a victory lap is, in my humble opinion, very unlikely. ...at the very least late 2025 or 2026, we might get more clarity, but not before then.

JMHO