That Q&A was interesting, but still omitted what we want to know, namely, what's it take for a revoked company to return to public trading, and what are the up- and down-sides of going public or staying revoked.
Since Nixon went public in the first place, he shouldn't cry about the bother and expense of being beholden to shareholders to file. He chose to go public, so he should meet his obligations.
Brenda's comments about reverse mergers these days pretty much being the promotion of shells, and the hint about shady lawyers who take that kind of work, are ... interesting. She forgot the say that way back when, when Nixon went public via reverse-merger, it wasn't so nefarious (but Nixon was never a shell).
