Thursday, March 07, 2024 3:46:33 PM
Judge's are often wrong, reversed and sometimes corrupt.
The offer to test was just that, an incentive to test. No jury would determine anything but. Just look at the comments that proceeded the offer letter...
Test, testing and testing results. Doesn't sound like they were ready to me. Sounds like they were testing. If they were ready to sell, why call it a testing partner/system after the fact? Why ask for further testing? Why say the outcome couldn't be known? Why ask to keep it confidential if you're ready to solicit?
Good Lord, he called Agri-Energy the testing partner and wanted to test it in a commercial test system before any potential on-sale bar. HELLO?
Greenshift had the right and responsibility to test the system and the USPTO agreed.
Greed and Evil. Agri-Energy should be ashamed of themselves.
Restart the litigation, funding will follow...
Good Luck To All!$!$
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM