| Followers | 54 |
| Posts | 17562 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Tuesday, March 05, 2024 4:28:54 PM
Well then. It shouldn't be a problem for you to produce verifiable proof that there is a large naked short position in DBMM.
Oh, and by the way? Elevated volume from years ago does NOT qualify as evidence of a short position.
If there are naked short shares, there should be Fail -to- deliver evidence. See any??? No you DON'T.
Produce VERIFIABLE evidence. Or stop flapping those jaws.
Oh, and by the way? Elevated volume from years ago does NOT qualify as evidence of a short position.
If there are naked short shares, there should be Fail -to- deliver evidence. See any??? No you DON'T.
Produce VERIFIABLE evidence. Or stop flapping those jaws.
Bearish
I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
