InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 195
Posts 24746
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: Poor Man - post# 675930

Monday, 03/04/2024 9:23:03 AM

Monday, March 04, 2024 9:23:03 AM

Post# of 705570
Intent to do the act that led to the bad thing is not necessarily difficult to prove. Usually, it is quite obvious. If they spoofed, you don’t have to prove they intended to do it. They did it or they did not, if they did it, the intent to do those specific things that spoofed the stock is more than adequate. If they created software that did prohibited things, likewise. Not so good for them. Don’t have to prove that the employee that then used the software, who did not know it spoofed stocks, thought he was doing something wrong.

Not unlike many torts, often people do things that are wrong, not with the intention to do “wrong”, but just the intent to do the act that caused a wrong.





I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News