How on earth do you factually know that Danzik and his crew are "all crooks"? Where is your evidence? Well, the fact is, you have failed to provide any evidence because you have none. As such, you resort to childish name calling--that's all you have. Thus, this is your ONLY argument: "Trust me when I declare that Danzik is a crook because . . . well, because I said so, and if you fail to believe me, well . . . 'good luck, cause I believe you are going to need it.'" What utter nonsense.
Let me give you an example of supporting a declaration with facts. I declare that Danzik is a liar. My evidence? He declared that he would provide investors with 16 videos that would serve to highlight Quantum Energy's operational technology, but he stopped at eight videos without offering a reason. So he lied. Danzik also stated that he would produce a longer video that would highlight the company's inaugural National Distributors Meeting presented at the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame. Well, he didn't. He lied again. Then, too, on October 27th, in regards to its advance photo lighting technology, Quantum management announced that within a few weeks it would release a "full Photon Lighting video presentation." Well, we are now into February and still they haven't released the video. So they lied.
Do you now see how this works LoneGrey? Evidence is key in support of a declaration. Without it, you are just pissing in the wind.
Market Data 
Markets 
