InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 168
Posts 21682
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/11/2006

Re: prototype_101 post# 174564

Monday, 01/08/2024 10:57:29 AM

Monday, January 08, 2024 10:57:29 AM

Post# of 194621
I cannot - but I will tell you it is someone who KNOWS, with a long and deep understanding of the industry. A bowling trophy. That was the comparison.

I should have reached out to that person long ago.

Having said that, I allow for the possibility that they really do have something but have done a HORRIBLE job of messaging that to the community. WHY? Because they don't seem to understand that their own reputation is not very good. And people like YOU have helped to tarnish their reputation, and badly.

Lightwave needs to own their own poor reputation brought about from years of leading the market to believe they were ready to commercialize -- when the REALITY - we now have seen - was that their materials were not stable until just a couple of years ago. They KNEW THIS and yet dragged a big fat golden carrot in front of unsuspecting naive retail investors all along... Helped along by a relentless hypester on this very board. That was WRONG.

NOW, they need to reach out for EXTERNAL VALIDATION...I have finally read the 2 papers from 2022 ECOC. All I can say is this: It sounds like they really have made some nice breakthroughs so why after an entire year do they still have no EXTERNAL VALIDATION? My common sense tells me because those who know are still looking for X,Y,Z to happen before they go from being doubters to believers. If that opinion is wrong, again they need external sources to come to their aid..but after AN ENTIRE YEAR it hasn't happened. Normally modern breakthroughs are recognized before a year goes by, no?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LWLG News