| Followers | 200 |
| Posts | 25597 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 04/03/2010 |
Thursday, December 21, 2023 3:38:59 AM
Yes, nWBO owns EDEN outright and Advent will as their CDMO in their factory, be necessarily involved in implementation. The company does not need to “license” the systems out and I don’t think that would be wise nor necessary for them to do in any instance at this time. It’s a critical process invention that gives the company basically a core technology of y to protect DCVax-L and its manufacture for many more years after other patents expire and depending on how they want to commercialize, maintaining their control and advantage is key. This is where I have and always will disagree with you Gary, there are not “desktop printers”, they won’t become and OEM selling these machines to hospitals to make their own concoctions, that is not this business and if they wanted to be in that business, they could have been selling the machines generically for years with Advent’s and Flaskworks subcontracting implementation for anyone that wanted. That is not the business they are in and I doubt very much they would get more than a few million out of it and with costs, I think it would be a loser. Hence why Flaskworks could be bought so inexpensively.
At this time, implementing Flaskworks will be useful and key for ensuring they have a competitive advantage. It is not absolutely necessary for them to get commercially licensed. But once implemented it will make them far more commercially viable and attractive as a venture. Of course they already have an amazing treatment for which they will presumably have set prices that not only makes NWBO viable but also a fully sustainable entity that can fund itself from operations going forward, become a general cancer vaccine company, also develop DCVax Direct and potentially perhaps develop other new products to ultimately become a major in Oncology. Or be acquired, which is also possible, and one would want to see them acquired at a fair price for what they have developed, so it is still important that their commercialization plan be viewed favorably by that big pharma partner.
At this time, implementing Flaskworks will be useful and key for ensuring they have a competitive advantage. It is not absolutely necessary for them to get commercially licensed. But once implemented it will make them far more commercially viable and attractive as a venture. Of course they already have an amazing treatment for which they will presumably have set prices that not only makes NWBO viable but also a fully sustainable entity that can fund itself from operations going forward, become a general cancer vaccine company, also develop DCVax Direct and potentially perhaps develop other new products to ultimately become a major in Oncology. Or be acquired, which is also possible, and one would want to see them acquired at a fair price for what they have developed, so it is still important that their commercialization plan be viewed favorably by that big pharma partner.
I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:38:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
