Anavex Life Sciences Corp (AVXL)

[Investor2014]

No they were not!

The treated MS patients were noted as having significant reduction of brain lesions as shown on imaging.

There have been no secret clinical trials with MS patients being treated with A2-73!

The examples are prophetic as has been explained every time an new Anavex patent application is discussed.

Properly Presenting Prophetic and Working Examples in a Patent Application

Prophetic Versus Working Examples

Prophetic examples, also called paper examples, are typically used in a patent application to describe reasonably expected future or anticipated results. Prophetic examples describe experiments that have not in fact been performed. Rather, they are presented in a manner that forecasts simulated or predicted results. In contrast, working examples correspond to work performed or experiments conducted that yielded actual results. The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP) states that prophetic examples should not be described using the past tense. MPEP 608.01(p), subsection II. Prophetic examples may be written in future or present tense. This drafting technique assists readers in differentiating between actual working examples and prophetic examples.