Thursday, October 26, 2023 1:55:11 PM
exwannabe,
... and anyone who does not acknowledge that crossing over to a known active treatment, that is still considered experimental until proper measures to validate it are accepted and approved through “the process”, is deliberately misinterpreting the data as if the active treatment is not really active and especially effective in mesenchymal signature non temozolomide using crossover patients. The exceptions rule to adequate and well controlled trials allowed for proof to be presented that inadequate measures needed to be replaced with new ones. That includes the use of ECAs that are properly vetted and accepted under peer review which Dr. Linda Liau began the process of in presentations to peers before May 10th, 2022. That was continued on that day with a top line data presentation with the use of the ECA measures mentioned in prior discussions then those ECAs were formally peer reviewed and accepted by JAMA Oncology. This is proof of a general validation of those measures by . THAT is your big problem that Dr. Bala continually reminds you of. The ECAs have been peer reviewed and accepted as valid by the peer community. That those with an agenda would oppose this is to be expected as they are protecting their own interests. The vast majority of peers are not aligned with them or the interests that they represent but rather with the patients. Even the investment community recognizes the change that is coming and the failure of NVCR to live up to patient expectations while Sawston builds a waiting list of patients wanting a real chance at a cure. Best wishes.
... and anyone who does not acknowledge that crossing over to a known active treatment, that is still considered experimental until proper measures to validate it are accepted and approved through “the process”, is deliberately misinterpreting the data as if the active treatment is not really active and especially effective in mesenchymal signature non temozolomide using crossover patients. The exceptions rule to adequate and well controlled trials allowed for proof to be presented that inadequate measures needed to be replaced with new ones. That includes the use of ECAs that are properly vetted and accepted under peer review which Dr. Linda Liau began the process of in presentations to peers before May 10th, 2022. That was continued on that day with a top line data presentation with the use of the ECA measures mentioned in prior discussions then those ECAs were formally peer reviewed and accepted by JAMA Oncology. This is proof of a general validation of those measures by . THAT is your big problem that Dr. Bala continually reminds you of. The ECAs have been peer reviewed and accepted as valid by the peer community. That those with an agenda would oppose this is to be expected as they are protecting their own interests. The vast majority of peers are not aligned with them or the interests that they represent but rather with the patients. Even the investment community recognizes the change that is coming and the failure of NVCR to live up to patient expectations while Sawston builds a waiting list of patients wanting a real chance at a cure. Best wishes.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
