News Focus
News Focus
Followers 41
Posts 22184
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/10/2015

Re: Entlarvt post# 40066

Friday, 09/29/2023 2:06:00 PM

Friday, September 29, 2023 2:06:00 PM

Post# of 42682
Geomagnetic reversal process causes an increases to natural CO2 levels and allows increased Solar/Cosmic radiation to reach the surface of the earth. IE, we are being exposed to greater levels of EM radiation. This does not factor in the increased EM exposure from geomagnetic activity as a result of the earths magnetic field weakening.

Furthermore, geomagnetic reversals due to the meandering of the earth’s central core are also the root cause of accelerated and more intense tectonic displacements, super volcanic aerosol emissions, tropospheric ozone depletion, increases in natural CO2 emissions, increases of solar irradiation at surface, atmospheric and tropospheric levels, and increases in GCRF and solar irradiation at all levels of earth atmosphere and surface.


Of interest to this paper is the fact that the highest flux of GCRF on record occurred during the
2006 solar minimum. In 2006 the earth’s magnetic field had weakened by 10% from normal. Normal, according to NASA, is an inconstant magnetic field of 0.5 Gauss by =/- 0.03 Gauss. A 10% decrease is -0.05 which is double the window of error. More current reports indicate that earth magnetic field has further deteriorated in the last 10 years to 15% of normal.


https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/169361

Claim 3

The levels of radiation emitted by electronic devices like cellphones and Wi-Fi are well below established safety limits and are not known to induce the symptoms described (headaches, fatigue, etc.).


Yes they are known to cause the symptoms described. Its known as "Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity". The studies provided show that metal implants amplify EM radiation.
Why electrohypersensitivity and related symptoms are caused by non-ionizing man-made electromagnetic fields: An overview and medical assessment
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935122007010

Claim 5

the idea that replacing all metal implants with silicon nitride will eliminate EM radiation amplification is not supported by scientific evidence.


Except for the fact that ceramics like Silicon Nitride are non-magnetic. Its magnetic materials that amplify EM radiation.

Moreover, Si3N4 is non-ferrous, non-electromagnetic, and partially radiolucent that minimizes scatter and associated artifacts on computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with Si3N4 implants [8].


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9224221/

Current Issues and Limitations of other "Biomaterials" as compared to Silicon Nitride
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=147252426

Provides link to post of mine which is of itself a collection of links to various studies about some of the drawbacks to current materials used in orthopedics as compared to Silicon Nitride. All backed by scientific studies as with just about anything informative i post.

Could it be that there is a strategy to distract people away from looking at the basic data?
Is all this an exercise to create more and more forum verbiage to drown out any serious discussion of evidence?

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SINT News