News Focus
News Focus
Followers 75
Posts 2018
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2003

Re: Ghors post# 178377

Thursday, 02/22/2007 10:25:24 AM

Thursday, February 22, 2007 10:25:24 AM

Post# of 435763
Garycoal #2.

4. Hartford v. IDCC. Hartford is asking a court for declaratory judgment that they have no duty to pay defense costs of IDCC in the Delaware Lanham case between NOK and IDCC. Like the Federal Insurace case I have no clue where this case stands. Hopefully, Olddog or someone can raid the courts docket and get us a scheduling order or some other goodies.

5. Samsum v. IDCC. As everyone here knows, IDCC won the arbitration. IDCC sued Sam for confirmation in a federal district court in NY. Sam counterclaimed to have the court void the decision. Sam has also filed a request for a third arbitration which in essence attacks the rates set by the #2 arbitration. We are waiting for the world arbitration court to determine if Sam will get the #3 arbitration and for the court to decide whether or not it wants to stay its decision pending the determination of the #3 arbitration.

Hope this helps settle some confusion as there are several cases and they do seem to run together at times.

IMO only

G Hors



Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News