Saturday, September 02, 2023 4:08:04 PM
DD, I'm of the same opinion as you regarding Dr Malkin, but since he is a MD, I give him the respect of listening to what he had to say. Here's my rebuttal:
1) It is one of the most striking coincidences I've ever seen that every MD critic of DCVax-L has ties to NVCR.
2) Much of what Dr. Malkin said in the Musella interview is simply not true. NWBO did not violate protocol and they did everything in accordance with FDA standards. This might not be obvious for some folks... I encourage everyone to do their own due diligence and get read the rebuttals out there from doctors who were involved in the trial. Also, do you really think JAMA did not due their own diligence on that when they published the article?
3) Dr. Malkin says he's "very very very" familiar with the DCV-L trial. Ok, Dr... you didn't participate in the trial itself... so where are you getting your information from? Obviously not from the 77 doctors in the JAMA article who believe in what they've accomplished. When you look at his financial disclosures there's a lot of paid sales/consultant dinners from NVCR. Clearly the DCV-L trial is being discussed in NVCR circles and sales dinners. Clearly they see it as a threat and one of the reasons their market cap has gone down the toilet. I've personally attended sales dinners like this (in a different industry) and the rhetoric he's quoting are the sort of lies they'll spin at these dinners to undermine the competition. It's ugly, but that's the reality of business. Clearly, there are many important doctors that believe in what's going on here.
4) Look at the grimace on Dr Malkin's face after he bashes the DCV-L trial! I've seen that look before, and it's the look of a man who's questioning what he just said... who's overcome with guilt and not confident he's doing the right thing.
The rubber meets the road at the MHRA. We will see what the oncology community decides to move forward with.
For the record, I think NWBO would get an FDA approval even if that was their first regulatory submission, but this is why NWBO is going with MHRA first. Fewer decision makers at the MHRA have NVCR's fangs in them.
1) It is one of the most striking coincidences I've ever seen that every MD critic of DCVax-L has ties to NVCR.
2) Much of what Dr. Malkin said in the Musella interview is simply not true. NWBO did not violate protocol and they did everything in accordance with FDA standards. This might not be obvious for some folks... I encourage everyone to do their own due diligence and get read the rebuttals out there from doctors who were involved in the trial. Also, do you really think JAMA did not due their own diligence on that when they published the article?
3) Dr. Malkin says he's "very very very" familiar with the DCV-L trial. Ok, Dr... you didn't participate in the trial itself... so where are you getting your information from? Obviously not from the 77 doctors in the JAMA article who believe in what they've accomplished. When you look at his financial disclosures there's a lot of paid sales/consultant dinners from NVCR. Clearly the DCV-L trial is being discussed in NVCR circles and sales dinners. Clearly they see it as a threat and one of the reasons their market cap has gone down the toilet. I've personally attended sales dinners like this (in a different industry) and the rhetoric he's quoting are the sort of lies they'll spin at these dinners to undermine the competition. It's ugly, but that's the reality of business. Clearly, there are many important doctors that believe in what's going on here.
4) Look at the grimace on Dr Malkin's face after he bashes the DCV-L trial! I've seen that look before, and it's the look of a man who's questioning what he just said... who's overcome with guilt and not confident he's doing the right thing.
The rubber meets the road at the MHRA. We will see what the oncology community decides to move forward with.
For the record, I think NWBO would get an FDA approval even if that was their first regulatory submission, but this is why NWBO is going with MHRA first. Fewer decision makers at the MHRA have NVCR's fangs in them.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
