re: " I can’t help it if you misinterpret what I was saying."
nope. you're spinning reality again.
mark/MTPP were in the producer role for the project.
you implied that MTPP should have been in the credits,
insinuating that mark took the limelight for himself, not MTPP:
[[ Speaking of misrepresenting…. Here is what I said:
“I don’t believe MTPP was ever mentioned specifically in the credits. Only Mark.” ]]
i pointed out that producers are always cited by name in film credits,
not by the companies they represent.
thus, your assertion is nonsensical based on standard crediting protocols.
you now post,
[[ I never said they should have been mentioned in the “producer” credits.
You decided to make it about the “producer” credits specifically. ]]
which suggests you don't understand the difference btwn producer and creative roles in film?
because you did imply that MTPP should have gotten a credit:
[[ “I don’t believe MTPP was ever mentioned specifically in the credits. Only Mark.
The point I was making is that MTPP shows up no where in the credits.” ]]
and MTPP was always in the producer role on the project,
represented by mark, who was cited by name, as is the protocol.
either you're confused about the entire concept.
or you're backpedaling and deflecting
because you know you got caught spewing FUD.
i suspect the latter...
re: [[ My original comment to Lucky stands. I can’t help it if you misinterpret what I was saying. ]]
as detailed above,
i know exactly what you were trying to say.
but it was, at best, misinformed.
but likely in reality,
just conscious intentional FUD, as usual with you... 🤦♂️
99.99% of all pinks are scams. Best to assume the other 0.01% are as well.