News Focus
News Focus
Followers 40
Posts 12211
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/01/2013

Re: delerious1 post# 143403

Sunday, 08/20/2023 5:22:14 PM

Sunday, August 20, 2023 5:22:14 PM

Post# of 180157
Here is a screen capture and the link to the law firm article so that people can actually verify the text:



https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;



GVSI does in fact have to be CURRENT WITH THE SEC to get corporate actions approved by the SEC/FINRA which it is not because Sharp already said he abandoned that effort.

This other law firm article also says the same thing.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]



And even if it did say "or other regulatory authority", which other regulatory authority would that be? FINRA? FINRA already issued GVSI a Notice of Deficiency.

No audited financials filed with the SEC means no reverse merger for GVSI and Sharp already said he abandoned getting GVSI audited, SEC registered and reporting.





But twisting information is a well known pumper MO.
Bearish
Bearish
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y