News Focus
News Focus
Followers 131
Posts 30478
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/10/2006

Re: TenKay post# 106836

Friday, 08/18/2023 8:51:00 AM

Friday, August 18, 2023 8:51:00 AM

Post# of 112711
tenkay, you and lucky raised history
that, afaik, is no longer part of the equation,
without bothering to explain to others here
the context of the history you were raising,
nor providing credible evidence
that the history is still relevant.

i replied by explaining the history you raised
and prompting you to show credible evidence
that the history is still relevant.

in response,
rather than responding with evidence and logic,
you immediately deflected
by asserting an emotional response to the history
that wasn't present.

that's not exposing a "tender spot,"
it's muddling bullcookie
with no intention of promoting
informed rational discussion,
with no attempt to explain your assertion
like a rational debater.

fwiw, this is that aspect that irks me most about you,
and why i invest time in calling you out
on your continued pattern of bullcookie.

despite obviously being well-versed
in trading law and lore,
you're proving yourself
more interested in strutting your ego,
pissing randomly around the room,
and trying to fabricate conflict,
than fostering a rational discussion of the gamble here.

i grok that you think this is purely a scam
and that mark has no intention of producing films of the IP.

imo, that's a reasonable position to take
given history and track record.

to point, i have posted openly about that history, myself,
both a decade+ ago and this summer.

what's not reasonable, imo,
is being a narcissistic asshat,
hurling feces for sport and self-adulation,
without bothering to explain specific concerns
to foster a rational discussion of them.

to point, by responding with
"hit a tender spot" deflection bullcookie immediately
rather than explaining your concerns in logical detail,
you are showing everyone here
that your priority is stroking your ego
and instigating conflict
rather than informed risk analysis discussion.

imo, life's too short for that nonsense.

and, honestly, i think you have much to contribute here
if you could manage to tuck your ego into your back pocket
and have honest fact-based discussions
rather than pissing around the room
like a maladjusted adolescent
and deflecting with bullcookie
every time you are challenged to defend your assertions.

question is:
are you capable of being the person you could be?

just food for thought...

99.99% of all pinks are scams. Best to assume the other 0.01% are as well.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today