Tuesday, August 01, 2023 12:55:24 PM
Well, yes and no. Because historical context is important. They REALLY go back to all the promises that were made to shareholders of what would happen when the CE came off and the covering of naked short shares would commence. Clearly - a con. For others it started when the company said they would uplist but then never announced they actually DID. Apparently they didn’t even APPLY!!! Even though they were eligible and able. This was a fraudulent statement - a lie told to shareholders to keep them buying or holding - most likely intended to create a pop in the price so investors and insiders could make money.
The events that people are keeping out in the light are factual events that have happened in the past 6 months and using the companies own words.
Funny how pumpers can’t seem to bring the same degree of accuracy. Just opinions, insults, diversions and ambiguity.
Shall we see 3’a today? Sadly, the lesson STILL won’t be learned.
The events that people are keeping out in the light are factual events that have happened in the past 6 months and using the companies own words.
Funny how pumpers can’t seem to bring the same degree of accuracy. Just opinions, insults, diversions and ambiguity.
Shall we see 3’a today? Sadly, the lesson STILL won’t be learned.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
