InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 45
Posts 3590
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/14/2020

Re: otterman post# 315810

Tuesday, 07/25/2023 9:32:39 PM

Tuesday, July 25, 2023 9:32:39 PM

Post# of 348605
Real shareholders are really tired of the Nevers Revisionist history when facts are documented in several places including Court Papers. How many times corrected?

Actual Facts:
1. Acquisition completed in 2012
2. Growth funding in place one year later coincident with 10-K 11/30/13
3. Mandatory Reaudit 11/15/13

Reaudit no fault of DBMM , 3 years of reaudit cost $157,300.

Everything put in neutral , funding pulled and litigation ensued the next month.

Mitigating circumstances acknowledged by ALJ and subsequent regulators.

DBMM prevailed and despite really asinine ‘throw in the towel ‘ and start again opinions which proved wrong, would never have gotten the quality of LTIs for growth and compliance, pwhich is the digital model of choice.

Complain but stick around and complain some more? Not very adult, but sofa opinions do not have measure .

The Management and DBMM have prevailed and done it with the facts while battling an enormous amount of obstruction and interference . It increased since the Dismissal. No
Coincidences.