Dr. Liau implied in one of her presentations during the Q+A period that the 29 permanent placebos had an mOS that was most likely lower than that of the placebos.
When the principal investigator has to IMPLY that the mOS was "most likely lower" when she has all the damn data (yet the company won't provide a complete data set) then that's a huge problem.
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
