Wednesday, July 05, 2023 2:51:32 AM
HyGro,
Thanks for reposting your opinion again, but you are misinformed about the P3 and the FDA.
The data were peer reviewed by independent physicians and qualified statisticians—please refer to JAMA Oncology. You might consider researching credible full-context sources to gather reliable information.
The DCVax-L cell-based technology has been under clinical investigation for a significant period of time, and the overall clinical data in total include three trials spanning many years. Safety and efficacy data have been gathered from trials with external controls and trials with placebo controls. The data include DCVax-L as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents.
https://www.fda.gov/media/120721/download
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201873
The interim PD1 combo data are brilliant, and the trial is significant for a number of reasons relating to FDA guidelines and NIH peer-reviewed grant funding.
In the combo trial, patients who receive DCVax-L + placebo are being compared to patients who receive DCVax-L + pembrolizumab.
The control arm is receiving DCVax-L. While DCVax-L is not the current SOC, it is highly significant and notable that DCVax-L is being permitted to fill the role of SOC as the best available therapy within this combo study for rGBM. The combo trial also follows the P3 in sequence which in itself validates the findings of the P3 study—the placebo group in the PD1 study would not be receiving DCVax-L today if the preceding P3 trial had not proven its efficacy.
The NIH is the most significant player in this game—If they had any doubt about the P3, the NIH would not continue their support and the FDA would not have permitted the combo trial to commence or continue.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201873
The U.S. NIH has supported the DCVax-L platform for years, and the NIH renewed its support in 2022 to continue to fund the development of this technology and to fund research into combination therapies.
NIH-funded DCVax-L research is ongoing at UCLA today.
NIH grants are peer-reviewed and the research that NIH funds is highly scrutinized in advance of the award and also intermittently for the term of the various research projects.
Mr. Newirth is another DCVax-L survivor well surpassing 10 years following a 2012 diagnosis! Congratulations!
https://www.hawaii.edu/news/2017/03/30/newirth-laker-for-a-day/
June 13, 2023 Interview:
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/fda-approval-brain-cancer-alzheimers
https://brownneurosurgery.com/breakthrough-brain-cancer-vaccine/
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/nov/17/im-just-carrying-on-vaccine-gives-brain-cancer-patient-years-of-extra-life
https://www.braintumourresearch.org/stories/in-hope/in-hope-stories/kat-charles
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/brain-cancer-discovery-clinical-trials
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/ucla-received-590-million-in-nih-funding-second-highest-total-for-academic-medical-centers-in-2020
https://www.fda.gov/science-research/advancing-regulatory-science/fda-nih-joint-leadership-council-charter
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172205513
Thanks for reposting your opinion again, but you are misinformed about the P3 and the FDA.
The data were peer reviewed by independent physicians and qualified statisticians—please refer to JAMA Oncology. You might consider researching credible full-context sources to gather reliable information.
The DCVax-L cell-based technology has been under clinical investigation for a significant period of time, and the overall clinical data in total include three trials spanning many years. Safety and efficacy data have been gathered from trials with external controls and trials with placebo controls. The data include DCVax-L as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents.
https://www.fda.gov/media/120721/download
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201873
The interim PD1 combo data are brilliant, and the trial is significant for a number of reasons relating to FDA guidelines and NIH peer-reviewed grant funding.
In the combo trial, patients who receive DCVax-L + placebo are being compared to patients who receive DCVax-L + pembrolizumab.
The control arm is receiving DCVax-L. While DCVax-L is not the current SOC, it is highly significant and notable that DCVax-L is being permitted to fill the role of SOC as the best available therapy within this combo study for rGBM. The combo trial also follows the P3 in sequence which in itself validates the findings of the P3 study—the placebo group in the PD1 study would not be receiving DCVax-L today if the preceding P3 trial had not proven its efficacy.
The NIH is the most significant player in this game—If they had any doubt about the P3, the NIH would not continue their support and the FDA would not have permitted the combo trial to commence or continue.
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04201873
The U.S. NIH has supported the DCVax-L platform for years, and the NIH renewed its support in 2022 to continue to fund the development of this technology and to fund research into combination therapies.
NIH-funded DCVax-L research is ongoing at UCLA today.
NIH grants are peer-reviewed and the research that NIH funds is highly scrutinized in advance of the award and also intermittently for the term of the various research projects.
Mr. Newirth is another DCVax-L survivor well surpassing 10 years following a 2012 diagnosis! Congratulations!
https://www.hawaii.edu/news/2017/03/30/newirth-laker-for-a-day/
June 13, 2023 Interview:
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/fda-approval-brain-cancer-alzheimers
https://brownneurosurgery.com/breakthrough-brain-cancer-vaccine/
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/nov/17/im-just-carrying-on-vaccine-gives-brain-cancer-patient-years-of-extra-life
https://www.braintumourresearch.org/stories/in-hope/in-hope-stories/kat-charles
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/brain-cancer-discovery-clinical-trials
https://www.uclahealth.org/news/ucla-received-590-million-in-nih-funding-second-highest-total-for-academic-medical-centers-in-2020
https://www.fda.gov/science-research/advancing-regulatory-science/fda-nih-joint-leadership-council-charter
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=172205513
Bullish
Believe carefully. This is the greatest and most powerful lesson that I have learned since arriving on Earth. Examine what you believe about yourself most importantly, and then believe carefully as you interact with the world.
Recent NWBO News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
