| Followers | 200 |
| Posts | 25596 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 04/03/2010 |
Saturday, April 29, 2023 2:54:20 AM
Management owns a substantial stake, and a substantial stake appears to be in friendly hands. As well, they have control in different ways that make a hostile buyout unattractive, something that triggers bears to attack management in a company like this to dislodge such control to enable their own machinations and manipulations.
Most likely management has a plan and a valuation that is much higher than BP wants to pay and BP is notorious for not diving into cell therapy plays and curative potential such plays. They also like to wait until all risks are fully played out. Hence all the best noises about this is intended to keep them away. It’s like bull repellent.
The one thing the bears can’t stop is the potential for partnership deals and combination trials. But if this is approved, those pathways will be much easier under new proposed FDA rules, so those pathways may not be as attractive as they used to be for small companies like this with a successful trial. If you can get your product effectively to a point where you have the benefits of approval for other conditions, with just real world data, not even a trial, with insurance and Medicare coverage, once you are already approved for one condition, the attractiveness of giving away the store in some areas to develop others is far less attractive. Meanwhile, those pathways are unproven to the day traders who muck around on the OTC and probably even to institutional investors. So there is less certainty despite the liberalization of things by the regulators. And the product is not yet approved for GBM to open up those possibilities, and bear narratives and distraction with lawsuits have diluted the arguments in favor of investing for noise.
Things will turn around and probably already have. We’ll see if that’s the case, but I expect it. This is just a roll along the volatility curve.
Most likely management has a plan and a valuation that is much higher than BP wants to pay and BP is notorious for not diving into cell therapy plays and curative potential such plays. They also like to wait until all risks are fully played out. Hence all the best noises about this is intended to keep them away. It’s like bull repellent.
The one thing the bears can’t stop is the potential for partnership deals and combination trials. But if this is approved, those pathways will be much easier under new proposed FDA rules, so those pathways may not be as attractive as they used to be for small companies like this with a successful trial. If you can get your product effectively to a point where you have the benefits of approval for other conditions, with just real world data, not even a trial, with insurance and Medicare coverage, once you are already approved for one condition, the attractiveness of giving away the store in some areas to develop others is far less attractive. Meanwhile, those pathways are unproven to the day traders who muck around on the OTC and probably even to institutional investors. So there is less certainty despite the liberalization of things by the regulators. And the product is not yet approved for GBM to open up those possibilities, and bear narratives and distraction with lawsuits have diluted the arguments in favor of investing for noise.
Things will turn around and probably already have. We’ll see if that’s the case, but I expect it. This is just a roll along the volatility curve.
I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
