Tuesday, January 17, 2023 8:14:57 PM
1. No, peer-reviewers do what they can with the limited time and information they are provided.
2. False, The Comment on JAMA Onc does, and the Journal of Neuro-Oncology Editorial both support exactly what I said and more. Both question the validity of the NWBO P3 article.
3. Dr. Bosch is the primary Corresponding Author that managed all the statistical analysis using his hand picked Health Economics consultants -- not experienced clinical trial consultants. All the other listed authors were mostly trial site operators. Only a few were actually producing the manuscript, most just got to review it. Look at the specifications of the authors by contribution.
These are certainly NOT low grade claims -- they challenge the whole conclusion that NWBO has claimed. When regulators get to see all the contested finding, it will be a different review and one that has significant risk of a rejection of the findings because of all the deficiencies that have been identified and now publicly available.
2. False, The Comment on JAMA Onc does, and the Journal of Neuro-Oncology Editorial both support exactly what I said and more. Both question the validity of the NWBO P3 article.
3. Dr. Bosch is the primary Corresponding Author that managed all the statistical analysis using his hand picked Health Economics consultants -- not experienced clinical trial consultants. All the other listed authors were mostly trial site operators. Only a few were actually producing the manuscript, most just got to review it. Look at the specifications of the authors by contribution.
These are certainly NOT low grade claims -- they challenge the whole conclusion that NWBO has claimed. When regulators get to see all the contested finding, it will be a different review and one that has significant risk of a rejection of the findings because of all the deficiencies that have been identified and now publicly available.
Recent NWBO News
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
