NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[biosectinvestor]

There are many journal articles that are not peer reviewed and not in the top journals in the world. That is why they went with a journal like Jama Onc., because of baseless allegations like the one you suggest, which is flatly absurd. The issues you raise were actually discussed just not in the manner you want them to be discussed. You apparently want them to apologize for the FDA making them have a crossover and go into great detail in a scientific paper about how they are very, very sorry.... They said it all factually, with no such unnecessary further detail. This no doubt makes shorts unhappy because they thought there was literally much more wrong than apparently there was, and not having those hooks to grab onto, they find their critiques lacking power and authority. But that doesn't make the article wrong or deceptive. It doesn't make the doctors who wrote it or the JAMA peer reviewers incompetent or not thorough. It just is not written the way some would prefer it to be written to allow for criticisms that have no merit.