This is all Complete and Utter Bullshit . . . for example take this one:
Nowhere did NWBO or the authors include the information of the FDA partial hold, the reason for it in their manuscript.
Please tell us what FDA issue would make any difference whatsoever in the results? Again for example if the FDA at the time had said they believe the trial is futile it would have made no difference since it is now know it wasn't. There is not reason to call this out in the paper other than to try to paint the FDA in a bad light and why when we are working on approval want to do that? This too is Complete and Utter Bullshit
Peer-reviewers have very limited time for reviewing manuscripts.
They were working on the paper for well over a year close to 2 years. All your allegations are bullshit.
Bullish
Men who are occupied in the restoration of health to other men, by the joint exertion of skill and humanity, are above all the great of the earth. They even partake of divinity, since to preserve and renew is almost as noble as to create.