Sunday, January 15, 2023 1:50:30 AM
Biased manuscript against DCVax-L has no weighting factor.
First and foremost, this article appears to be biased by two individuals who rebuke Dr. Linda Liau's efforts regarding DCVax-L, IMPO.
"This one of the primary bias between the NWBO trial and the external comparators that did not require complete or near complete resection. This has been verified by researchers who have criticized the NWBO trial for considerable bias that raises serious questions of the trials validity.
Per H-G
"Read the peer-review article: https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/neuonc/noac281/6958519?searchresult=1"
Per H-G comments
"This one of the primary bias between the NWBO trial and the external comparators that did not require complete or near complete resection. This has been verified by researchers who have criticized the NWBO trial for considerable bias that raises serious questions of the trials validity."
There is not one reference to NWBO in this article
https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/neuonc/noac281/6958519?searchresult=1
There appears to be some biased overtones in this article, for example,
"Recently, Liau et al. reported data on autologous tumor lysateloaded dendritic cell vaccination (DCVax-L) in JAMA Oncology on November 17th 2022 and at the
27th Society of Neuro-Oncology (SNO) Annual meeting on November 20th 2022.2 While the efforts of
all contributors to the study need to be acknowledged, there are significant concerns about the
study report and conclusions."
These individuals fail to even address Dr. Linda Liau with any respect whatsoever.
They do address Dr. Linda Liau in their references.
Source
(1) Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
(2) The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
The above facilities hold zero weight in comparison to Dr. Linda Liau and her team at UCLA including NWBO and that is a fact, IMPO. In assents anyone can submit a rebuke article " Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccination (DCVax-L) in glioblastoma:
breakthrough or fata morgana?"
Again, the research at UCLA and NWBO is far more credible than any research by "Martin J. van den Bent Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Dr Molenwaterplein 40
3015GD Rotterdam The Netherlands", IMPO. Anyone who knows anything with respect to the latest research for both nGBM and rGBM brain cancer. They know who Dr. Linda Liau and her team at UCLA are doing and they are considered one of the most advanced leading experts in the world in their field, and that is also a fact, IMPO. People need to do their own DD to understand the facts, and the fact that DCVax-L works, and many doctors, scientists and professionals are both impressed and agree with Dr. Linda Liau and NWBO, IMPO.
First and foremost, this article appears to be biased by two individuals who rebuke Dr. Linda Liau's efforts regarding DCVax-L, IMPO.
"This one of the primary bias between the NWBO trial and the external comparators that did not require complete or near complete resection. This has been verified by researchers who have criticized the NWBO trial for considerable bias that raises serious questions of the trials validity.
Per H-G
"Read the peer-review article: https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/neuonc/noac281/6958519?searchresult=1"
Per H-G comments
"This one of the primary bias between the NWBO trial and the external comparators that did not require complete or near complete resection. This has been verified by researchers who have criticized the NWBO trial for considerable bias that raises serious questions of the trials validity."
There is not one reference to NWBO in this article
https://academic.oup.com/neuro-oncology/advance-article/doi/10.1093/neuonc/noac281/6958519?searchresult=1
There appears to be some biased overtones in this article, for example,
"Recently, Liau et al. reported data on autologous tumor lysateloaded dendritic cell vaccination (DCVax-L) in JAMA Oncology on November 17th 2022 and at the
27th Society of Neuro-Oncology (SNO) Annual meeting on November 20th 2022.2 While the efforts of
all contributors to the study need to be acknowledged, there are significant concerns about the
study report and conclusions."
These individuals fail to even address Dr. Linda Liau with any respect whatsoever.
They do address Dr. Linda Liau in their references.
Source
(1) Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine 1, Medical University, Vienna, Austria
(2) The Brain Tumour Center at the Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam
The above facilities hold zero weight in comparison to Dr. Linda Liau and her team at UCLA including NWBO and that is a fact, IMPO. In assents anyone can submit a rebuke article " Autologous Tumor Lysate-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccination (DCVax-L) in glioblastoma:
breakthrough or fata morgana?"
Again, the research at UCLA and NWBO is far more credible than any research by "Martin J. van den Bent Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Dr Molenwaterplein 40
3015GD Rotterdam The Netherlands", IMPO. Anyone who knows anything with respect to the latest research for both nGBM and rGBM brain cancer. They know who Dr. Linda Liau and her team at UCLA are doing and they are considered one of the most advanced leading experts in the world in their field, and that is also a fact, IMPO. People need to do their own DD to understand the facts, and the fact that DCVax-L works, and many doctors, scientists and professionals are both impressed and agree with Dr. Linda Liau and NWBO, IMPO.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
