Ask yourselves why a Judge would keep approving repeated 3a exemptions when there was nothing unique happening here. There was no emergency other than Yazbeck claiming he was behind on some bills. Is that really enough for a judge to say "Ok, go ahead and violate rule 144"? "Just go ahead and borrow as much money as you desire and your financier can dump shares as immediately as they desire"? All because Daniel just asked? Why would a judge approve such nonsense requests? And multiple times? Come on. The battery that powered this scam was the JUDGE.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.