InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1513
Posts 35277
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Re: JMMatthews post# 277998

Tuesday, 01/10/2023 1:03:13 AM

Tuesday, January 10, 2023 1:03:13 AM

Post# of 349497
I do hope you're right, JMMatthews. It isn't fair for me to now give odds on DBMM winning or losing on the PFR, but I have always been on the shareholders' side, even when it appears that I'm not. FWIW, had DBMM accepted revocation 5 years ago (as I suggested 5 years ago and ever since) the new FORM 10 to reregister would have allowed DBMM to trade unencumbered about 90 days after accepting revocation. No O.I.P. outstanding......no P.F.R. pending.....just normal trading. Refusing to do so is all on Linda Perry......not on anyone else.

The D.O.E. has been tenacious against 2,308 other companies. As we can see by the five 90 day extensions for the PFR it should be reasonable to think the D.O.E. is being just as tenacious against DBMM. That doesn't mean the D.O.E. will succeed.....it merely means the D.O.E. is still pursuing revocation.

I have no vested interest in DBMM losing the P.F.R. and I will gladly eat humble pie for DBMM to win.

Best o' luck, JMM!

To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .