Just Politics

[B402]

during the first trimester, governments could not prohibit abortions at all; during the second trimester, governments could require reasonable health regulations; during the third trimester, abortions could be prohibited entirely so long as the laws contained exceptions for cases when they were necessary to save the life or health of the mother.

Roe........

Original quote....I agree with Roe v.......Nothing after 12 weeks with exceptions for the mothers health.....Which was agreeing with the post responded to without writing a Fn thesis....In turn was attacked in true dem fashion....Ridiculous

12 wks


16 weeks


20 weeks

https://www.emedicinehealth.com/image-gallery/first_trimester_8_weeks_picture/images.htm

Me personally, not sure just viability outside the womb should be the marker as science advances...I do agree with a womans right to choose.....And Dems once took up for the little guy......Paid for one once, turned out to be twins,,, still feel a bit of guilt and released two roses in free fall as a little memorial/ceremony.....'Abortion', dont even like the word itself but would never want to go back.......But with dems discussions you can see why it wasn't the over riding factor in the election....Margins didn't match those that agree with a woman's right to choose....Perhaps many tried a discussion on the subject....