Sunday, December 04, 2022 3:21:48 PM
As a portfolio investor, with a great deal of both proper investment strategy experience and negotiating skills, I had to read the post a few times and
Are you suggesting DBMM to start all over with the SEC? That is what SCOTUS provided asking for new evidence because of the pressure of the Lucia case in Dec 2017. The Company did just that and got a Dismissal.
IMO, it is ridiculous to tell shareholders to write recommendations to one of the most prestigious attorneys in the field and a seasoned management who has moved forward with LTIs? That is wrong.
IMO- the CE is coming down and the dialogue is between OTCM and the Company. The rest will fall into place.
Get this straight The Company is looking after the shareholders just as Judge Foelak stated in her Dismissal.
Shareholders know.
Are you suggesting DBMM to start all over with the SEC? That is what SCOTUS provided asking for new evidence because of the pressure of the Lucia case in Dec 2017. The Company did just that and got a Dismissal.
IMO, it is ridiculous to tell shareholders to write recommendations to one of the most prestigious attorneys in the field and a seasoned management who has moved forward with LTIs? That is wrong.
IMO- the CE is coming down and the dialogue is between OTCM and the Company. The rest will fall into place.
Get this straight The Company is looking after the shareholders just as Judge Foelak stated in her Dismissal.
Shareholders know.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
