| Followers | 54 |
| Posts | 17526 |
| Boards Moderated | 3 |
| Alias Born | 01/11/2004 |
Sunday, December 04, 2022 12:06:16 PM
Great post. Even though it is logical, you had to know that the most die hard advocates of the mega NSS position would be derisive of your post.
Any course of action that has DBMM accepting any type of revocation and then subsequently filing a Form 10 is not conducive to the dream of the “naked short squeeze”.
Rather than being logical and following that course of action, years of extensions and the years of “Investor Updates” that will undoubtedly follow them (promising that DBMM will “soon” be ok) will be accepted and then complained about.
LMAO.
Any course of action that has DBMM accepting any type of revocation and then subsequently filing a Form 10 is not conducive to the dream of the “naked short squeeze”.
Rather than being logical and following that course of action, years of extensions and the years of “Investor Updates” that will undoubtedly follow them (promising that DBMM will “soon” be ok) will be accepted and then complained about.
LMAO.
Bearish
I keep telling myself....deep breath....count to ten....try to answer without personal attack...if available, always try to present fact to back up your opinion.
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
