Sunday, December 04, 2022 11:42:54 AM
Or #3. Have DBMM lawyers file a FOIA request as to why this has continued with extension upon extension, all while DBMM has met requirements while being, for better terms, jerked around.
Then take the FOIA information to the Office of the Inspector General and show any actual or perceived indiscretions.
As for your comment about a win/win, I completely disagree. By continually extending the PFR, DBMM is held back on making financial decisions and gains. Then redoing another 211 is more money they have to put out and thinking the SEC would quick track a form 10 for them, that’s rich. The SEC could say what they want and do the complete opposite, kind of like dismissing something, then for a year jerking a company and it’s shareholders around all in the guise is ‘investor safety’
Go DBMM!
Then take the FOIA information to the Office of the Inspector General and show any actual or perceived indiscretions.
As for your comment about a win/win, I completely disagree. By continually extending the PFR, DBMM is held back on making financial decisions and gains. Then redoing another 211 is more money they have to put out and thinking the SEC would quick track a form 10 for them, that’s rich. The SEC could say what they want and do the complete opposite, kind of like dismissing something, then for a year jerking a company and it’s shareholders around all in the guise is ‘investor safety’
Go DBMM!
Recent DBMM News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/14/2026 08:45:29 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/14/2026 09:46:30 PM
- Form 10-K - Annual report [Section 13 and 15(d), not S-K Item 405] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 10:01:05 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/15/2025 09:01:51 PM
