Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

12yearplan, The now bold bits of yours in this bit of yours

"These journalists filling a column giving an opinion piece was too easy/empty
And what YOU based your conclusions on so I dismissed them out of hand.
Sorry ;).
If you are basing your bravado on that one biologists comments
Which were very generous imo to JP
His criticism was quite specific and I don't think would elicit much argument from JP.
He wasn't writing a treatise on that Lobster specifically but used it as a tool.
Like the Biologist said, he isn't a Psychologist and JP would likely say the same - not a Biologist.
Umm, wait a second .. this just in - I think JP thinks Biology informs much.. "

One they were not simply opinion pieces. And there is more than on biologist who sees Peterson's using a lobster to justify his world view about human hierarchy. Seems to me you are missing that's the biologists bitch with him. That his saying aggression is required to be successful in the human world as evidenced by the lobster's world.

And your "If you are basing your bravado on that one biologists comments" Where the hell did that thought come from. Nobody here is being courageous in this discussion. Unless you feel you are.

Like this of yours

"Yes, there are many hit pieces coming from insecure locales like the NY Times and Wapo.. read them; always hinting at right wing parallels without the knock out punch - sad/poor journalism.
Until there is a smoking gun I'll stay with the substance behind, the motivation behind ideas put forward.
P - To be fair to this Wapo girl,..."
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=170501338

Insecure locales??? You make those kinds of baseless comments then you simply ignore my comment on them

"Yes, there are many hit pieces coming from insecure locales like the NY Times and Wapo.. read them; always hinting at right wing parallels without the knock out punch - sad/poor journalism.
Until there is a smoking gun I'll stay with the substance behind, the motivation behind ideas put forward."
P - Insincere? Peterson who feeds you faulty science is more sincere than those you show you where he is wrong. That's absurd.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/replies.aspx?msg=170501338