Lol, "rigorous" for me ;).. and what one might expect from a search on the interwebz. Intended and supplied to a messy board owned by criminals ;). Perhaps, you can direct me to a website that coalesces said topic. I looked as far afield as I could at the time - happy to look further at your direction. JP said himself he will stand toe to toe with any "academic" that challenged (don't remember now the specific context if it even was specific - drop him an email). These journalists filling a column giving an opinion piece was too easy/empty And what YOU based your conclusions on so I dismissed them out of hand. Sorry ;). If you are basing your bravado on that one biologists comments Which were very generous imo to JP His criticism was quite specific and I don't think would elicit much argument from JP. He wasn't writing a treatise on that Lobster specifically but used it as a tool. Like the Biologist said, he isn't a Psychologist and JP would likely say the same - not a Biologist. Umm, wait a second .. this just in - I think JP thinks Biology informs much.. Dinner call, c u .. thanks