News Focus
News Focus
Followers 318
Posts 55241
Boards Moderated 12
Alias Born 08/19/2009

Re: CantonG post# 265766

Wednesday, 11/16/2022 6:07:13 PM

Wednesday, November 16, 2022 6:07:13 PM

Post# of 370386
Don't read the stupid article... READ THE CASE!

It IS NOT about naked shorting at all! The unregistered shares apparently existed at the hedge fund, they just weren't delivered within the prescribed 8 days which should have resulted in the brokerage filing FTDs... but they didn't!

Hence why the brokerage is being charged, not the selling hedge fund!

The selling hedge fund isn't even named in the case!

This case is about a brokerage failing to follow procedure, not naked short selling!

Need another link to it?

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2021/lr25092.htm

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/2021/comp25092.pdf

<Geesh>


.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent DBMM News