Tuesday, November 08, 2022 9:17:16 PM
HyGro,
The hold is easy to figure out. All remaining treatment patients were enrolled AFTER the screening hold was put in place. That’s the first clue. Randomization did not change but those who had been assigned/randomized to SOC/placebo were obviously kept out of the trial after the hold. That’s the second clue. How do we know this? The hold began at about 300 patients already enrolled so a typically well balanced enrollment process somehow got tremendously skewed with the last 31-32 patients enrolled with the proof being found in the missing 17 SOC/placebo patients, reported at a much later date but suspected early on. This is backed up by what was posted on this forum by way of a shared interaction between a German patient’s wife and her husband’s doctor who hinted that her husband had been assigned to SOC/placebo but would not be enrolled. In what was shared she also asked when the treatment might be available and the doctor expected it around 2020. This is when Covid hit hard but also when the artisan method and perhaps Microden, precursor to Edens, would have been ready. It was also the typical time for when unblinding to NWBO finally would have occurred.
Regulators, and perhaps NWBO, likely determined a link between survival and pseudoprogressors during a safety check and look at the 2015 BLINDED Spring Refresh data. Without NWBO technically having the ability to “know” from unblinding what needed to be done (because without unblinding there is no way to “know” what expected demand might be) this left the company in no man’s land until that issue could be resolved. This also likely put regulators in a situation where they had to be ethically involved, especially in Germany where the last patients were being enrolled and where knowingly subjecting patients to a lesser treatment regimen is not permitted. Hence the screening hold. Fraunhofer stated it as enrolling to the point statistically necessary. Very interesting!; ).
The delays from Covid and likely need for a “bigger boat” (data indicating SOC for rGBM and GBM should be considered when anticipating demand) surely became confirmed at unblinding of data to NWBO based on how data has been presented to date and which is when the massive ramp up by Cognate and CRL likely began in earnest with next level manufacturing, represented by Edens, seeming to be being waited on even while supply chain issues were being worked around by modifications to that manufacturing upgrade. Pretty amazing stuff and always glad to share. Best wishes.
The hold is easy to figure out. All remaining treatment patients were enrolled AFTER the screening hold was put in place. That’s the first clue. Randomization did not change but those who had been assigned/randomized to SOC/placebo were obviously kept out of the trial after the hold. That’s the second clue. How do we know this? The hold began at about 300 patients already enrolled so a typically well balanced enrollment process somehow got tremendously skewed with the last 31-32 patients enrolled with the proof being found in the missing 17 SOC/placebo patients, reported at a much later date but suspected early on. This is backed up by what was posted on this forum by way of a shared interaction between a German patient’s wife and her husband’s doctor who hinted that her husband had been assigned to SOC/placebo but would not be enrolled. In what was shared she also asked when the treatment might be available and the doctor expected it around 2020. This is when Covid hit hard but also when the artisan method and perhaps Microden, precursor to Edens, would have been ready. It was also the typical time for when unblinding to NWBO finally would have occurred.
Regulators, and perhaps NWBO, likely determined a link between survival and pseudoprogressors during a safety check and look at the 2015 BLINDED Spring Refresh data. Without NWBO technically having the ability to “know” from unblinding what needed to be done (because without unblinding there is no way to “know” what expected demand might be) this left the company in no man’s land until that issue could be resolved. This also likely put regulators in a situation where they had to be ethically involved, especially in Germany where the last patients were being enrolled and where knowingly subjecting patients to a lesser treatment regimen is not permitted. Hence the screening hold. Fraunhofer stated it as enrolling to the point statistically necessary. Very interesting!; ).
The delays from Covid and likely need for a “bigger boat” (data indicating SOC for rGBM and GBM should be considered when anticipating demand) surely became confirmed at unblinding of data to NWBO based on how data has been presented to date and which is when the massive ramp up by Cognate and CRL likely began in earnest with next level manufacturing, represented by Edens, seeming to be being waited on even while supply chain issues were being worked around by modifications to that manufacturing upgrade. Pretty amazing stuff and always glad to share. Best wishes.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
