There is a difference here. There was no ”release” and the company has said nothing about meeting endpoints. What you heard was the presentations of third-party scientists who ran the trial. No one has seen the slides or the video of those presentations anywhere else but on a third-party charitable website and on the original forum website, and yet a critic like Adam Fuerstein wants to imply The Company committed fraud or did x,y or x. The facts are different than these critics want to say, but boy do they scream and repeat the false narratives, over and over. They’re so frustrated because it makes them liars.
But the company has announced nothing. Only scientists…who don’t work for the company. Their value is they are independent. They work for research universities, and their value to them and the world, their most valuable commodity is their reputations.
Endpoints were discussed and some data, in those presentation, but not a publication with more than just those highlights. A publication will provide fuller data and analysis.
We know NWBO is still observing an embargo on release of such information. The company never released the endpoints or any discussion thereof in a press release nor have they ever given a press interview.
The answer, therefore is quite obvious, even if some critics want to insist otherwise. People have their agendas, but facts are facts.
I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.
AI
