You know, your responses don't fare well in the psychological analysis department.
Fucking once a fucking again. Put the Israeli atrocities against the Palestinians into a context that's historical and relevant.
I mentioned the Australian genocide against the aborigines because I know you're Australian and was trying to understand how a descendant of murderous colonizers has purchase to criticize another country's colonizing behavior. The shit that your people did all of a sudden doesn't count? Or we'll just ignore it for now? This is what I meant by historical perspective.
It's like a convicted wife beater, a repeat offender, lecturing other husbands on how they should treat their wives. Because they haven't beaten their wife in a couple of years.
As I responded to sortagreen, the Palestinian leadership is literally stealing food and medicine from its own people, the level of graft is stupefying. It is starving its own people, killing them en masse so they can live the high life in Tangiers and wherever. But hey, look over there, the Israelis!! (this is not to excuse Israeli crimes against humanity, but to try to contextualize it in the region where it's occurring.)
Because the media portrayals of the bad Israelis bring in the bucks. Seize the narrative and prosper. There's so much less money to be had from peace.
Yes, of course, you can criticize Israel, but if your concern is truly for the Palestinians, why criticize only Israel? It's an unserious approach to the overall situation in my opinion.
What says you about that?
