They amended their complaint and refiled, before the decision. And then the decision itself provided them with the opportunity to update and refile. They did not because those were the only facts and details they had and their suit was crushed for failure to state a claim. They had nothing. The suggestion that oh, the original filing was way back when, and things happened afterwards that would have validated their claim. It's patently false. Just another counterfactual way of suggesting they are right, there are facts they know...that were not addressed. But that's clearly false also.
Since then, they've only had social media to make the bogus claims and that has allowed them to maintain the lies. Lies that they KNEW a court would not allow them to maintain because of the Federal Rules of Evidence. They can't make stuff up and draw crazy conclusions and make false inferential conclusions that are patently off base in court without consequences. On social media, they can do and say anything, even false things, suggest facts and details that are not even consistent with the record that they have read countless times... they can do and say whatever they want.
We see people doing the same thing currently in our nation's affairs. They say things to media, but never in court documents, for the same reasons. Their job is to win the public relations drama, and but they know they haven't a chance in court. They do not care.
I own NWBO. My posts on iHub are always posted expressly as just my humble opinion (IMHO) and none are advice, just my opinion. I am NOT a financial advisor, and it is assumed that everyone is responsible for their own due diligence.
AI
