| Followers | 239 |
| Posts | 15506 |
| Boards Moderated | 1 |
| Alias Born | 03/29/2014 |
Friday, September 09, 2022 10:15:22 PM
You specifically said that the FDA never allowed the trial to resume screening, and even now (in your post), you state that the first action the FDA took was to "issue the partial hold that blocked screening new patients."
Then of course, in February 2017, the company announced that the FDA had lifted the halt that halted the screening of new patients.
It is YOUR THEORY (and not a hard fact) that the FDA did not let them screen new patients, despite the HARD FACT that the FDA lifted the halt allowing them to screen new patients.
You have no HARD PROOF that your theory is a fact... you just offer your statement that it is a "hard fact."
You may think that your THEORY is the only logical conclusion to come to, but it really does have an obvious flaw.
It simply doesn’t make sense that the FDA would lift the halt to screen new patients, and then not let the trial (should they have chosen to do so) screen new patients.
You know, we've had this same conversation countless times over the years, so your theory is not new to me (and others that have been here for some time), and my response is likely not new to you either.
Then of course, in February 2017, the company announced that the FDA had lifted the halt that halted the screening of new patients.
It is YOUR THEORY (and not a hard fact) that the FDA did not let them screen new patients, despite the HARD FACT that the FDA lifted the halt allowing them to screen new patients.
You have no HARD PROOF that your theory is a fact... you just offer your statement that it is a "hard fact."
You may think that your THEORY is the only logical conclusion to come to, but it really does have an obvious flaw.
It simply doesn’t make sense that the FDA would lift the halt to screen new patients, and then not let the trial (should they have chosen to do so) screen new patients.
You know, we've had this same conversation countless times over the years, so your theory is not new to me (and others that have been here for some time), and my response is likely not new to you either.
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
