InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 696
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/12/2017

Re: ATLnsider post# 510013

Thursday, 09/01/2022 7:25:20 AM

Thursday, September 01, 2022 7:25:20 AM

Post# of 688880
It is fine to believe those things will happen, I do too, they are just not 'facts' until they actually occur. You can look it up in the dictionary if you don't believe me.

As pqr notes, and my original point, is that "clinical significance" is different than "statistical significance." One is proving a positive, the other is disproving a negative. The slide you quote does not indicate that the DC-Vax trial achieved "clinical significance." The fact that they claim the trial results were "clinically meaningful" and "statistically significant" does not mean you can mix-and-match the terms. I am sure that if they had achieved "clinical significance," that they would be saying that.

There is nothing wrong with having supportable opinions or basing investment decisions on them, I would hope everyone does that. I just have a problem when people state things as facts that aren't actually facts. Those attacking the company state opinions as facts all the time. Just look at the ridiculous Enron talk going on again right now. 'Linda Powers worked at Enron,' fact. 'She knew about (was involved in) the fraud being committed,' opinion. But both get stated (or at the least insinuated) as facts when tehy are not.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News