News Focus
News Focus
Followers 200
Posts 25597
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/03/2010

Re: Roman516 post# 500424

Tuesday, 08/02/2022 3:27:55 PM

Tuesday, August 02, 2022 3:27:55 PM

Post# of 823442
Yes, the company did not draft those presentations, doctors who are not employed by and do not in most cases own shares in NWBO drafted those presentations. Dr. Liau is quite careful with her disclosures and avoiding any suggestion of conflict of interest or business interest in NWBO’s particular success.

The various doctors involved and the statistical firms involved are reviewing specifically as outside reviewers. If the trial had in fact failed, it is doubtful there would be so much support from the broad array of doctors in this trial. That’s the first arm of objectivity. Then you have the enthusiasm of non-profits on multiple continents and patients. You have the PIM designation and the HE designations, that came from regulators reviewing the trial during its course and suggesting very positive and carefully arrived at conclusions. Neither designation was ever revoked, regardless of negative posters suggesting they provided no benefit.

There are many objective sources to suggest that there is much positive interest and many in support of this treatment that come with a high degree of authority. UCLA still comments prominently and glowingly of DCVax-L research on its website.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News