Monday, August 01, 2022 9:55:19 PM
HyGro,
Given that fact that DCVax-L data results have already been reviewed and evaluated by multiple creditable sources there is a high probability of sucess as the data already indicates this to be true. Therefore, it appears that you are putting the horse before the cart. In other words, the probability of approval from the MHRA is very high. However, approval without the ability to manufacture a successful vaccine is worthless since there is no meaningful way to meet the product demand objectives after approval is granted. The Sawston, UK facility has spent considerable time and effort with their initial manufacturing process method, and now with their latest manufacturing method utilizing the Flaskworks devices.
For more details, refer to the following link.
https://www.medcityhq.com/2020/02/26/nices-approach-to-reimbursement-of-advanced-therapies/
"Undoubtedly, efforts have been taken to facilitate discussions between different stakeholders at different levels in order to ensure accessibility to promising new technologies in a timely manner but ultimately it is the companies’ responsibility to price their products responsibly and work with NICE and NHS England to ensure timely access for patients to promising technologies associated with significant benefits."
Clearly stated by NICE, you cannot ensure timely access for patents unless you already have implemented the means to provide the product to market and the patients. This supports the fact that if you receive approval and no means to provide the product, the patients will have to wait a considerable amount of time, years and many patients will die as a result of manufacturing delays.
Since the Sawston, UK and NWBO have already invested considerable effort in manufacturing readiness, it would make sense that approvals would be in order sooner rather than later. All the best!
Given that fact that DCVax-L data results have already been reviewed and evaluated by multiple creditable sources there is a high probability of sucess as the data already indicates this to be true. Therefore, it appears that you are putting the horse before the cart. In other words, the probability of approval from the MHRA is very high. However, approval without the ability to manufacture a successful vaccine is worthless since there is no meaningful way to meet the product demand objectives after approval is granted. The Sawston, UK facility has spent considerable time and effort with their initial manufacturing process method, and now with their latest manufacturing method utilizing the Flaskworks devices.
For more details, refer to the following link.
https://www.medcityhq.com/2020/02/26/nices-approach-to-reimbursement-of-advanced-therapies/
"Undoubtedly, efforts have been taken to facilitate discussions between different stakeholders at different levels in order to ensure accessibility to promising new technologies in a timely manner but ultimately it is the companies’ responsibility to price their products responsibly and work with NICE and NHS England to ensure timely access for patients to promising technologies associated with significant benefits."
Clearly stated by NICE, you cannot ensure timely access for patents unless you already have implemented the means to provide the product to market and the patients. This supports the fact that if you receive approval and no means to provide the product, the patients will have to wait a considerable amount of time, years and many patients will die as a result of manufacturing delays.
Since the Sawston, UK and NWBO have already invested considerable effort in manufacturing readiness, it would make sense that approvals would be in order sooner rather than later. All the best!
Recent NWBO News
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
