If the "among other things" were more severe or contained something more important than the "acquisition" issue, wouldn't the SEC have named the "other things" as the predominant reason? Tells me the "other things" were not as important to the SEC as the "acquisition" issue. The "other things" weren't even important enough to elucidate on or clarify.
Just wondering.
How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct.
Benjamin Disraeli
Where are you going to find the most intelligent, educated and capable crooks? Follow the money...... wall street, and the naked short is their best tool. - Mt bigsky