Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

The hate matrix of online gaming

Related
2017 - Is AI Sexist?
In the not-so-distant future, artificial intelligence will be smarter than humans. But as the technology develops,
absorbing cultural norms from its creators and the internet, it will also be more racist, sexist, and unfriendly to women
[...]
Tay’s designers built her to be a creature of the web, reliant on artificial intelligence (AI) to learn and engage in human conversations and get better at it by interacting with people over social media. As the day went on, Tay gained followers. She also quickly fell prey to Twitter users targeting her vulnerabilities. For those internet antagonists looking to manipulate Tay, it didn’t take much effort; they engaged the bot in ugly conversations, tricking the technology into mimicking their racist and sexist behavior. Within a few hours, Tay had endorsed Adolf Hitler and referred to U.S. President Barack Obama as “the monkey.” She sex-chatted with one user, tweeting, “DADDY I’M SUCH A BAD NAUGHTY ROBOT.”
By early evening, she was firing off sexist tweets:
“gamergate is good and women are inferior”
“Zoe Quinn is a Stupid Whore.”
“I fucking hate feminists and they should all die and burn in hell.”
Within 24 hours, Microsoft pulled Tay offline.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=129960098

2018 - The far right movement may seem all but dead, but a crop of political candidates are introducing ideas into the mainstream.
[...]
“As soon as people know about something – a trend or a new movement – then they are quick on the bandwagon to pronounce it dead. The far right in America is surging, and a surge like this normally lasts four or five years. We’re really only at the beginning of this thing.”
[...]
Pitcavage compares the current state of the far right in America to something that happened to the movement in the mid-1980s. The white supremacist movement was well established back then, and when the skinheads arrived, it threw the dynamics into disarray. The skinheads were a new subculture, bringing with them new people, a new energy and new slang – and though it took a while, eventually the movement learned to accept the new groups and a new equilibrium set in.
-----
What Gamergate should have taught us about the 'alt-right'
Read more - https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/dec/01/gamergate-alt-right-hate-trump
-----
“Now we have an influx of new, extreme people,” Pitcavage told me. “Generally young, with a lot of energy ... It was born online, on 4chan, in the manosphere, and came about through events like ‘Gamergate’. The older generation of white supremacists finds them confusing, and the new group has yet to learn what it means to be public with their beliefs.”
P - That’s what you saw in Charlottesville: a new generation of white supremacists learning what it means to be public for the first time.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=142843413

"[...]To say the least, it was unsettling and sickening. My last few comments were, c'mon you guys, you're pulling my chains. Quit kidding around. I don't think they were kidding around due to some stuff they were saying. Then I just basically said enjoy the j6 hearings and watching your hero go down in flames. Hopefully he'll kill himself or flee to russia. Which of course a chorus of maga insults were flying. "

Sounds like you fell into one of the cesspits of Gamergate. As far as i understand they don't kid. They are serious in everything they say.

The Lowy Institute is an independent think tank founded in April 2003 by Frank Lowy to conduct original, policy-relevant research about international
political, strategic and economic issues from an Australian perspective. It is based in Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lowy_Institute

Matthew Sharpe

Chatrooms enable players to discuss games, yet are increasingly a hotbed for glorifying violence and radicalisation.


AJ/Flickr

Published 27 Oct 2020 15:00 0 Comments

Emerging Threats .. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/sites/default/files/1056961804_e94bd9c3b2_h.jpg
Global Issues .. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/issues/global-issues

All links

The word that the extreme right use to describe the political radicalisation of newcomers to their worldview is “red pilling”. The metaphor comes from to the techno-dystopian film The Matrix. But its modern cultural usages refers to a radical political conversion or awakening, where individuals wake up to the truth around them. In more intense cases, red pilling refers the radicalisation of individuals into the “alt-right”, into extremist beliefs which normalise contempt and hatred against minorities, women and the “left”, and legitimates forms of symbolic and physical violence against them.

Much of this discourse takes place online, especially in closed communications systems such as Discord. The rise of the alt-right is also closely connected with online sci-fi and gaming, including, most notoriously, the ugliness of “Gamergate .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_controversy ”.

This year the Project Whispers project released a data set of over 9 million messages from alt-right agents on the Discord server on the Steam .. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamergate_controversy .. website. Steam hosts PC games, including hundreds of single-shooter scenarios, including many based on quasi–right wing fantasies such as Freedom Fighters, “an intense third-person action game set in an alternate history New York during the invasion of a foreign superpower”, and Call of Russia, where players take on Vladimir Putin’s muscular persona to protect the “Motherland” from invading “furries” (a subculture, including many gay and trans people, who dress up as animals).

Steam’s linked Discord chatrooms enable players to discuss game-playing and, as is increasingly apparent, have become a hotbed for extreme-right groups glorifying violence .. https://www.revealnews.org/blog/hate-report-gaming-app-has-173-groups-that-glorify-school-shooters/ .. and looking for new recruits .. https://unicornriot.ninja/2019/neo-nazis-use-discord-chats-to-promote-new-zealand-copycat-shootings/ . Many of them are preparing for what they see as an upcoming “boogaloo” or race-based civil war in the United States. These growing “boogaloo” movements, or cells, often refer to their “red pilling” as part of their realisation that they need to “accelerate” societal disintegration so that a new awakening and new society can emerge.

The dump of the Discord messages offers researchers a unique window into understanding this dark world of “red pilling” of individuals into extremist beliefs, which normalises contempt and hatred against out-groups, and legitimises symbolic and physical violence against them.

Becoming a part of a radicalised milieu means first being initiated into
an ever-changing lexicon of mocking-cynical or ironic in-jokes.

One way of approaching this troubling phenomenon is by analysing the specific forms of language used by far-right actors. In examining the communications of far-right extremists from the Discord server, we could see that far-right agents speak in certain, distinct ways, both amongst themselves as they develop and affirm their solidarity networks, and as they reach out to members of the wider community to recruit them to their cause.

Becoming a part of a radicalised milieu means first being initiated into an ever-changing lexicon of mocking-cynical or ironic in-jokes and shibboleths: self-designations such as “1488ers”, “Deus vult”, the “Pepe the Frog” image and more, as well as mocking terms for enemies such as “social justice warriors”, “soyboys”, “dindus” and “cultural Marxists”.

This use of humour has two functions. First, it allows extreme ideas to be simultaneously spoken while remaining publicly retractable: “it’s only a joke; don’t be such an SJW!” or the like. Secondly, it nevertheless introduces newcomers into discriminatory jokes about Jews, Muslims, women and other hate targets. This humour allows for the gradual normalisation of more extreme forms of objectivising language, a process of what might be called “mock it ‘‘til you make it’.”

The second layer of red pilling language involves what is called “violence-framing” language. Violence-framing makes extreme hatred “make sense”, despite basic norms civility and peaceful resolution of social conflict. Its forms are:

* Conspiracism: the idea that the world, behind the scenes, is being run by nefarious, criminal, super-powerful plutocrats, socialists, secret societies, Jews …

* Forbidden fruit-ism: that the conspirators are in possession of enviable material, political and profoundly criminal prerogatives, including sexual prerogatives over women and minors, as we see so virulently in the QAnon delusion;

* The deeply cynical stance that all noble-sounding, universal ideals are lies, and instruments in the hands of enemies to disempower honest, decent people;

* The pan-polemical idea that the meaning of life, beneath the false veneer of social ideals and laws, is struggle or war, a “hard truth” to be grimly embraced, against all sentimentalism (“being a snowflake”);

* The Manichaean stance that, looked at clearly, the world is divided into friends and enemies, a hard “either/or” in which compromise is misguided;

* The scornful, quasi-elitist view that ordinary people, who are not radicalised, are fools or dupes.

Finally, at the heart of the radicalising onion, are “violence-mobilising” ideas. Their acceptance, in conjunction with (and often as inferences from) the violence-framing ideas, directly license actual violence against others.

We can detect different categories of violence mobilising ideas and language. The first type consists of hate-filled dehumanisation of enemies and outgroups. The language depicts empowered elites as predators (such as wolves, tigers, foxes) to be violently destroyed. Vulnerable out-groups like immigrants, the disabled or welfare recipients are depicted as parasites, to be despised for their vulnerability, since they are an unproductive drain on the wealth produced by honest, productive people. But the most dangerous violence-framing dehumanisation – as in the Nazis’ genocidal treatment of the Jews – positions outsiders as unclean, poisonous or contagious pathogens who must be urgently excised from the community, or even exterminated.

The second form of violence-motivating language is apocalypticism: the view that the situation is, beneath the surface and beyond all nuances, so dire that a failure to act, as soon as possible, will be catastrophic. At this point, not acting violently is what “makes no sense” to red-pilled individuals and seems unforgivably weak.

Online gamers, often young single men, in a virtual environment saturated with apocalyptic narratives of (civil) war, conspiracies and invasion, in which shooters are invited to mercilessly slay hosts of dehumanised foes, has been specifically targeted by extreme-right agents for a reason. If we are to prevent the next lone gunman from emerging from gaming platforms such as Steam, or indeed many such gamers taking to the streets to act out the narratives they have been playing out online, the need to understand how this radicalisation works, using what language, is urgent.

This article is part of a year long series examining extremism and technology also available at the Global Network on Extremism and Technology .. https://gnet-research.org/ , of which the Lowy Institute is a core partner. This piece draws on ideas developed in conjunction with Dr Imogen Richards and Associate Professor Geoff Boucher for a research grant proposal on understanding and preventing right wing online radicalisation.

Image via Flickr user AJ

https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/hate-matrix-online-gaming