Lykiri, in order to move the ball forward with the UK can you file a new FOI request and simply ask the following. Was there an inspection of Advent Bioservices facility and was a license granted to them? (milestones)
Asking for the entire report of the recent inspection results could be asking for too much.
Their answer to you does not in any way admit they actually inspected a facility and only that if they had done so it is subject to disclosure procedures.
Regulators have this tendency to say they can't disclose things until they are finished (granting them freedom of movement to scam citizens, but also can become unwitting participants to other's schemes). They can be preventing the community from working with regulators to stop scams from continuing (like if NWBO lied about the inspection process or license) when they won't disclose milestones such as a successful inspection, whether one really happened, and if a license was granted, as they become public knowledge due to press releases made by NWBO.
From my vantage point, they could be asking you to refine your request for honest reasons and so you should ask again just for the milestone information.
I would not accept an incomplete, no disclosure answer from them for the new request. I would become more demanding at that point and I hope you and everyone else feel the same.
The way it should work is: as soon as a public company involves a regulator in a filing or press release, any citizen should be able to ask that regulator if it is indeed true, they should be notified immediately either way so that citizen can take action against the company for lying if they did. Failure of the system to be exactly this way is not honest work and police should be involved. Involved in the RIGHT way...
Citizens can speed up approval of NWBO
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
