| Followers | 200 |
| Posts | 25596 |
| Boards Moderated | 0 |
| Alias Born | 04/03/2010 |
Tuesday, April 19, 2022 8:53:52 PM
It was good that he shared the source. He has no credibility. At least he has a source.
It would seem that he used to attack DCVax as garbage, then the journal came out, and he could not say that anymore. He tried to deride UK journalists who were covering it at BBC and major outlets as shoddy journalists at one point, but obviously that would not fly. Even some US outlets covered the interim published data, including US News.
Then also, Dr. Liau took a prominent role in talking about the drug. He had already gone after her when she said everyone was living longer, making it seem like she had definitively said that the trial had failed, which she had not said. Then when the articles came out in the UK, not only did he go after the press, but he started to denounce Dr. Liau as some sort of Yahoo who did not know what she was doing and wasn't really all that smart. And of course that was a bad tack and he stoppped.
His current argument is that NWBO doesn't own the rights 1) to DCVax-L; and 2) that ATL-DC is not DCVax. These arguments appear to be false duds, based on his lack of any convincing evidence, but it's what he has got.
All IMHO.
It would seem that he used to attack DCVax as garbage, then the journal came out, and he could not say that anymore. He tried to deride UK journalists who were covering it at BBC and major outlets as shoddy journalists at one point, but obviously that would not fly. Even some US outlets covered the interim published data, including US News.
Then also, Dr. Liau took a prominent role in talking about the drug. He had already gone after her when she said everyone was living longer, making it seem like she had definitively said that the trial had failed, which she had not said. Then when the articles came out in the UK, not only did he go after the press, but he started to denounce Dr. Liau as some sort of Yahoo who did not know what she was doing and wasn't really all that smart. And of course that was a bad tack and he stoppped.
His current argument is that NWBO doesn't own the rights 1) to DCVax-L; and 2) that ATL-DC is not DCVax. These arguments appear to be false duds, based on his lack of any convincing evidence, but it's what he has got.
All IMHO.
Recent NWBO News
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
