InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 13
Posts 1557
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/14/2018

Re: learningcurve2020 post# 31958

Friday, 02/25/2022 3:53:19 PM

Friday, February 25, 2022 3:53:19 PM

Post# of 34702
Concerning our being below $1 for Nasdaq rules. I do not believe that is even close to being one of major problems. This below $1 problem can be easily solved.
And before I say it, YES, I KNOW, "most times" after a reverse split, the stock price continues down.
BUT, a reverse split like 1 for 10 is (math/value wise) for the investor, neutral and longer term, an added benefit.
Neutral because (in theory), you lose NO value, instead of you owning 10 shares at 0.30, you now own 1 share at 3.00, no value lost, Nasdaq problem solved.
An added benefit is because now, down the road there are 10 times LESS shares available for the SHORTS to screw with.

Our 2 real problems are buyout versus partnership.
I have been clear on my positions on those.
A Buyout ANYTHING CLOSE TO THIS CRAZY INSANE SICK LOW VALUE is ... and should continue to be ... OUT OF THE QUESTION.

WE NEED a partnership with a big biopharma firm ... PERIOD.

And YES, I want James Allison to get off his ass and use his fame and notability, to pick up the damn phone and TRY HIS BEST to get us a deal. (and Juan Vera and Ann Leen and others also).

P.S. Phantom, feel free to forward a copy of this post to your connections at Marker.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent MRKR News