InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1269
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/18/2018

Re: Eagle1947 post# 221159

Thursday, 02/17/2022 9:26:48 PM

Thursday, February 17, 2022 9:26:48 PM

Post# of 232693
There is only one way to prove this wrong. Revenue. But all we get is more proof that the material is being used and our revenue isn't there.

Josh is on the reddit board and has done an excellent job in proving the material is in use,vastly and widely but little to back up LQMT is involved with license fees. But on the reddit board, its highly censored so any negative flow gets you kicked out so its hard to get any information or sentiment from the revenue side. The question that never gets answered is how do we get paid? Who ultimately has LQMT's interest for shareholders? What was the PLA designed to do? Clearly we know Li's infrastructure is being built out - but we haven't heard anything from him since the purchase of his shares. And I even brought up the scenario proposed in this thesis around CCP.

The only thing that keeps me wondering is the less then 50% control when it was bought...and we are all anticpating/waiting/seeing proof for Apple to use it so we can see the light. However, to get to $1, we need $100m in revenue.

Is this even possible anymore?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent LQMT News