Tuesday, February 01, 2022 5:08:57 AM
From the rare pediatric disease priority review voucher fda guidance:
(Sorry about the numbers)
Q5. What does “Does not seek approval for an adult indication in the original rare
pediatric disease product application” mean?
249 250
251 An applicant cannot receive a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher if the application
252 seeks approval for an adult indication in the original rare pediatric disease product application.
253 We interpret this criterion to mean that, to preserve voucher eligibility, the applicant cannot seek
254 approval for a different adult indication (i.e., for a different disease/condition) in the original rare
255 pediatric disease application. If the applicant seeks approval for use by pediatric and adult
256 populations with the rare pediatric disease, the applicant will still be eligible for a voucher if the
257 approved use includes pediatric use, as described in Questions 3 and 4. If the applicant obtains
258 approval for use only in an adult population with the rare pediatric disease, the applicant is
259 ineligible for a voucher.
260
261 Thus, under this interpretation, an applicant can preserve voucher eligibility even if the applicant
262 seeks approval for use by adults in addition to pediatric patients with the rare pediatric disease.
263 One reason we are interpreting the statute in this way is to avoid incentivizing sponsors to
264 exclude adults affected by the rare pediatric disease from clinical trials or to exclude adult data
265 from the subsequent marketing application solely for the sake of voucher eligibility, when such
266 exclusions may not be scientifically or ethically acceptable for the reasons described below.
267
268 Clinical Trial Design – Clinical Trials for a Potential Rare Pediatric Disease Product May Need
269 to Include Individuals Over 18 Years of Age for Scientific or Ethical Reasons: Clinical trials for
270 rare diseases and conditions are challenging because, among other factors, the small patient
271 populations limit the opportunities for study and verification of results. Because such clinical
272 trials are likely to be small and at risk of being underpowered, FDA expects that rare disease
273 clinical development programs will attempt to include all patients with the rare disease or
274 condition that are available for study and who could reasonably be expected to benefit from the
275 intervention, regardless of the age of the patient (where feasible and appropriate based on the
276 disease/condition and expected effects of intervention).24 Indeed, studies using novel therapies
277 should generally be conducted in young adults (18 to 21 years of age) prior to exposing
24 See,e.g.,ICH andFDAGuidance,“E11Clinical InvestigationofMedicinalProductsinthePediatricPopulation,” SectionII.A,availableat http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm129477.pdf.
8
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
Draft – Not for Implementation
278 adolescents and younger pediatric patients; for children to be included in early phase
279 investigations, there must be a prospect of direct benefit for an individual child to be studied in a
280 clinical trial in which more than a minor increase over minimal risk is presented by an
281 intervention or procedure.25 For all of these reasons, it may not be scientifically or ethically
282 appropriate to exclude those over 18 years of age from a clinical trial evaluating a potential rare
283 pediatric disease product.
284
285 Data to Include in a Marketing Application – Available Adult Safety and Effectiveness Data
286 Must be Included in the Application: If clinical safety and effectiveness data are available in an
287 adult population (i.e., individuals over 18 years) at the time of the submission of an original
288 application for a potential rare pediatric disease product, these data must be included in the
289 application for FDA’s review. 26 In many cases, if there is a population over 18 years of age with
290 the rare pediatric disease that could benefit from the product and for whom there are available
291 data to support the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the product, labeling for such a
292 population should be sought in the original product application.
293
294 As noted, seeking approval for use in both adults and pediatric patients with the rare pediatric
295 disease will not affect voucher eligibility. However, we remind applicants seeking a voucher
296 that – whether or not they seek approval for use in an adult population – we expect them to
297 submit data adequate for labeling the drug for use by the full range of affected pediatric patients
298 (see response to Question 4).
299
300 Note that after a sponsor has been awarded a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher for
301 approval of a drug, the sponsor can develop the same drug for additional indications, including a
302 different adult indication, without losing the voucher.
Sorry about the numbers. Link is below
https://www.fda.gov/media/90014/download
(Sorry about the numbers)
Q5. What does “Does not seek approval for an adult indication in the original rare
pediatric disease product application” mean?
249 250
251 An applicant cannot receive a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher if the application
252 seeks approval for an adult indication in the original rare pediatric disease product application.
253 We interpret this criterion to mean that, to preserve voucher eligibility, the applicant cannot seek
254 approval for a different adult indication (i.e., for a different disease/condition) in the original rare
255 pediatric disease application. If the applicant seeks approval for use by pediatric and adult
256 populations with the rare pediatric disease, the applicant will still be eligible for a voucher if the
257 approved use includes pediatric use, as described in Questions 3 and 4. If the applicant obtains
258 approval for use only in an adult population with the rare pediatric disease, the applicant is
259 ineligible for a voucher.
260
261 Thus, under this interpretation, an applicant can preserve voucher eligibility even if the applicant
262 seeks approval for use by adults in addition to pediatric patients with the rare pediatric disease.
263 One reason we are interpreting the statute in this way is to avoid incentivizing sponsors to
264 exclude adults affected by the rare pediatric disease from clinical trials or to exclude adult data
265 from the subsequent marketing application solely for the sake of voucher eligibility, when such
266 exclusions may not be scientifically or ethically acceptable for the reasons described below.
267
268 Clinical Trial Design – Clinical Trials for a Potential Rare Pediatric Disease Product May Need
269 to Include Individuals Over 18 Years of Age for Scientific or Ethical Reasons: Clinical trials for
270 rare diseases and conditions are challenging because, among other factors, the small patient
271 populations limit the opportunities for study and verification of results. Because such clinical
272 trials are likely to be small and at risk of being underpowered, FDA expects that rare disease
273 clinical development programs will attempt to include all patients with the rare disease or
274 condition that are available for study and who could reasonably be expected to benefit from the
275 intervention, regardless of the age of the patient (where feasible and appropriate based on the
276 disease/condition and expected effects of intervention).24 Indeed, studies using novel therapies
277 should generally be conducted in young adults (18 to 21 years of age) prior to exposing
24 See,e.g.,ICH andFDAGuidance,“E11Clinical InvestigationofMedicinalProductsinthePediatricPopulation,” SectionII.A,availableat http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm129477.pdf.
8
Contains Nonbinding Recommendations
Draft – Not for Implementation
278 adolescents and younger pediatric patients; for children to be included in early phase
279 investigations, there must be a prospect of direct benefit for an individual child to be studied in a
280 clinical trial in which more than a minor increase over minimal risk is presented by an
281 intervention or procedure.25 For all of these reasons, it may not be scientifically or ethically
282 appropriate to exclude those over 18 years of age from a clinical trial evaluating a potential rare
283 pediatric disease product.
284
285 Data to Include in a Marketing Application – Available Adult Safety and Effectiveness Data
286 Must be Included in the Application: If clinical safety and effectiveness data are available in an
287 adult population (i.e., individuals over 18 years) at the time of the submission of an original
288 application for a potential rare pediatric disease product, these data must be included in the
289 application for FDA’s review. 26 In many cases, if there is a population over 18 years of age with
290 the rare pediatric disease that could benefit from the product and for whom there are available
291 data to support the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of the product, labeling for such a
292 population should be sought in the original product application.
293
294 As noted, seeking approval for use in both adults and pediatric patients with the rare pediatric
295 disease will not affect voucher eligibility. However, we remind applicants seeking a voucher
296 that – whether or not they seek approval for use in an adult population – we expect them to
297 submit data adequate for labeling the drug for use by the full range of affected pediatric patients
298 (see response to Question 4).
299
300 Note that after a sponsor has been awarded a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher for
301 approval of a drug, the sponsor can develop the same drug for additional indications, including a
302 different adult indication, without losing the voucher.
Sorry about the numbers. Link is below
https://www.fda.gov/media/90014/download
Recent AVXL News
- Anavex Life Sciences Highlights New Scientific Findings on Shared Biology Between Autism and Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/14/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Present at the 25th Annual Needham Virtual Healthcare Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/07/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex withdraws EU approval filing for Alzheimer’s therapy • IH Market News • 03/30/2026 12:39:26 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Provides Comprehensive Regulatory Update • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/30/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/25/2026 08:06:00 PM
- Anavex withdraws EU marketing application for Alzheimer’s therapy blarcamesine • IH Market News • 03/25/2026 02:06:58 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Provides Update on Regulatory Review in the EU for Blarcamesine to Treat Early Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/25/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Presents New Data from its AD-004 Phase IIb/III Trial at AD/PD 2026 Conference Demonstrating Consistent Correlation Between the Treatment Effect of Oral Blarcamesine and Preservation of Brain Volume in Early Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/23/2026 11:30:00 AM
- New Scientific Findings Highlight Hypothesis of Autophagy Failure as a Precursor of Amyloid Beta and Tau Pathology in Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/20/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Presents Significant Treatment Effects of Blarcamesine in New Advanced Alpha-Synuclein Model of Parkinson’s Disease at AD/PD 2026 Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/17/2026 11:30:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Present at the Citizens Life Sciences Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/03/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Present at the 46th TD Cowen Annual Health Care Conference • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/25/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/25/2026 11:07:01 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Appoints Seasoned Healthcare Leader to Board of Directors • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/23/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/09/2026 09:40:27 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 02/09/2026 12:31:17 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Reports Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Financial Results and Provides Business Update • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/09/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences to Announce Fiscal 2026 First Quarter Financial Results on Monday, February 9, 2026 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 02/03/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Joins ACCESS-AD, a Major Initiative Funded by the European Commission, Through the Clinical Evaluation of Blarcamesine as Part of a Precision Medicine Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 01/13/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/09/2026 10:26:26 PM
- Edelson Lechtzin LLP Announces an Investigation of Anavex Life Sciences Corp. (NASDAQ: AVXL) and Encourages Investors with Substantial Losses Contact the Firm • PR Newswire (US) • 01/09/2026 01:13:00 AM
- Anavex Life Sciences Appoints Senior Vice President Global Head of Neurology • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 01/08/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Receives FDA Feedback on Alzheimer’s Disease Program • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 01/06/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Submitted Request for EMA to Re-Examine Its Opinion • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 12/18/2025 12:30:00 PM
- Anavex Life Sciences Provides Update on Regulatory Review in the EU for Blarcamesine to Treat Early Alzheimer’s Disease • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 12/12/2025 09:05:00 PM
