TLD is a result of an amalgam of regulatory changes and science. It could be fantastic and the same crowd will spin it into a story of a false positive, a scam. We already know they will do it and are determined to constantly do it over years. Fantastic results will not deter them from creating a false sense of uncertainty and confusion regardless of whatever THE COMPANY says. The one thing they have a hard time with is claiming they are better scientists than the actual scientists.
That’s why. They are not scientists, they are rhetoriticians. They are poli-sci majors. Further more, even one scientist complaining, looks like someone upset that he won’t get to be celebrated for HIS work. They look jealous in the face of a peer reviewed article confirming a consensus of scientific viewpoints.
So yeah, there are very obvious and good reasons why they are going this route. No one saying otherwise is going to fool anyone down that route again, at least I am assuming at NWBO. Companies get fooled regularly to just announce and it’s a disaster because it can be portraits as a purely commercial, not really scientific viewpoint and “of course they said that”, they have so much to lose saying anything otherwise. A journal review is not subject to that criticism in reality. They can say it, but it is patently false. It is also why Dr. Liau and others are meticulous at staying commercially unconnected, and also why they keep trying to spin that meticulousness as a false rift between here and NWBO. Everything is spun and they never stop. They do not care about the science, they have an agenda.
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
